We were made for so much more…

The popular Christian group Switchfoot—released a song aptly titled, “Meant to Live” several years back. The song was a huge success for the group, both on the Christian airwaves, but also on the Modern Rock chart. Needless to say, the song help propel the album “The Beautiful Letdown” to platinum status, earning rave reviews. I love ‘Meant to Live’—and a couple of the lines actually describes our journey in life: “we want more than this world has got to offer…we were meant to live for so much more, have we lost ourselves.” I am a huge fan of C. S. Lewis, (not sure if you knew that, but…it’s true), and Lewis made a decisive argument in his masterpiece, Mere Christianity, about desire. Lewis basically asserts that innate in all of us is a desire for something else, (see esp. Book III, Hope). At any rate, one could also make an argument that part of ‘being made for so much more’ is that we were made for relationships as well. One look at the Trinity, and one can safely conclude that prior to the creation of the earth, and all of its entailments, God the creator existed in community. The Father, Son and the Holy Spirit! That explains why God throughout the history of man, yearns for a relationship with man. During the Old Testament period, God endeared himself to the Israelites, while Jesus during his ministry surrounded himself with people. The apostles invigorated the need for salvation, impressed upon by Jesus, (individually), in order to be a part of a collective body of believers (church). Throughout the medieval period, the renaissance and reformation, all the way to the restoration period to our time—there has never been a time in the history of the church, where man was saved to be alone. This yearning for relationship and the nonsensical of the notion that is very popular in American culture, individualism, is captured most amazingly by Beth Moore. Says Moore:

“God created us to need something or someone else. Sooner or later, any healthy individual discovers that autonomy doesn’t cut it. Once we confront our need for someone or something beyond ourselves, we will subsist on the alms of others if we don’t discover Christ. Like beggars we go from person to person with our empty cup, crying, “Can’t you add anything to my life?” They might throw in a coin or two. In fact, a few may be weekly…and probably weary…tithers. But when we shake the cup daily, the tiny echo reminds us how empty we remain. Until we allow Jesus to fill our cups daily, we simply subsist. The good news Christ may want to preach to you today is that you don’t have to subsist. You were meant to thrive.” (Beth Moore, Jesus the One and Only, 52).

Stirring words indeed. Moore is spot on with her assessment; we will make it on the kindness of other people. But for how long? One cannot know for sure. So what is the answer then? The answer lies in the person of Jesus Christ. To have Christ in one’s life, will exonerate us from the tortures of everyday living—to a life so beautiful and meaningful, in the person of Christ. Within this framework one will ultimately discover the reason behind creation, and consequently, man. We weren’t created to simply exist, we were meant for so much more. Do you believe you were made for so much more? Blessings.

Forward

One of the joys of my life is the ability to sing. Though I do not consider myself a good singer, I take a lot of pleasure in singing. The essence of ‘forward thinking’ is captured most provocatively by musicians, across the board. Some of our hymns articulate this concept—to move forward, to think ahead. Some of these songs include: I Am Resolved, Where He Leads I’ll Follow, I Know Who Holds Tomorrow, I Am Thine O Lord, Lord, I’m Coming Home, Pass It On, and Soon and Very Soon. What is the point? There is only one point, ‘forward thinking.’ Christianity is simply a way of saying, we are moving forward. For the Christian, forward thinking was necessitated by the Cross of Jesus. There is only one way for the Christian, post baptism—and that is: marching forward. When one becomes a Christian, he/she is literally saying to God, I am yours; do with me as you please. Such a person is also heralding a new beginning to others: family members, friends, or peers. A new Christian shares that they are no longer bound by self but captured by Christ. Such a person is fully prepared to embrace this new life, this new beginning, and set a platform for others to follow suit. Example after example in God’s Word provides a glaring assessment of folks who died to self so as to serve God with all that they had. Folks like Peter, Paul, Barnabas, Aquila & Priscilla, come to mind. Through good times and challenging times, these folks ‘resolved’ to ‘follow’ the Way, even to the point of death. Now, Paul’s words come to mind when discussing this very idea of folks who left us examples, ‘for everything that was written to teach us, so that through endurance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.’ The very mention of Paul and Peter, and their forward stance, is not in there for us to gloss over. It is in there for us to consider with the utmost respect. Now, not all of those who spent time with Jesus, his disciples, or Paul were disciplined to the end, as illustrated by Demas, a co-worker of Paul. How can anyone forget the tone as he wrote with much pain and concern regarding Demas, ‘(d)o your best to come to me quickly [Titus], for Demas [my co-worker and fellow soldier has left the work] because he loved this world…’ Such behavior begs the question: Why? Well, it could be because we are so fixated on tradition, or a set of beliefs/doctrine, that we become unwilling to consider anything else in light of the evidence. In other words, we are so set in what we know to be true, that even if Jesus were telling us to rethink our positions on certain matters we would maintain our stance, unmoved as it were. That brings me to a statement uttered by the famed writer and speaker John Piper who said, ‘If you don’t feel strong desires for the manifestation of the glory of God, it is not because you have drunk deeply and are satisfied. It is because you have nibbled so long at the table of the world. Your soul is stuffed with small things, and there is no room for the great.’

Forward thinking depends on the Cross of Christ. Forward thinking can only materialize when I saturate myself in the Grace of God. Forward thinking depends on the veracity of my drinking ability, from God’s well. Alternatively, backward thinking is associated with nibbling just enough to think we are satisfied. We may get away with it momentarily when we assign blame for lack of growth on others. But eventually, the truth will come out on whether or not you prefer your soul stuffed with small things, thus keeping the great things at bay. Or are you characterized by consistent heavy drinking, which thrills the soul and satiates your heart’s desire? It is imperative to heed what Oswald Chambers said about the need to part with our ‘commonplace religious shoes.’ If we are to take seriously our calling to follow Christ, to love people based on a love of God—and evangelize a world void of meaning and truth, commonplace religion should be rendered useless. We are about moving forward! That’s where our Lord wants us to be. That call cannot wait. It has to be now! Forward thinking represents itself by asking questions, probing the edge of our comfort level, so as to keep us accountable and uncomfortable. We cannot allow familiarity to dictate what our view of God should be—because naturally, our view of God based on familiarity can either be good or very limited. At times, our default mode can be somewhat limited. For instance, there are many who refuse the Gospel’s call because of tradition. The common sayings include, but are not limited to: (1) well, this is what my father and mother believed, and that’s my belief—because they believed it, it must be true, (2) this is the family church!, or (3) some have even exclaimed that he/she is more comfortable with this, as opposed to that—so there! However, the pitfall represented by this line of thinking is a definite lack of independent thinking. Chambers went on to say that we also need to seriously ‘rid [ourselves] of all undue familiarity.’ When we approach scripture based on what someone else believes, we (inadvertently or not) proclaim that we are bound to the dictates of others. That presents a danger. What is the danger? Well, someone said it this way, ‘(a) worldview tested by truth will inform imagination and meditation, not the other way around.’ The intrinsic mirage that truth can be understood through imagination or meditation is salacious to say the least. Truth is truth! It is independent of imagination or meditation. Now, one can find truth in one’s imagination or meditation, but truth exists independently of these items. To ignore that there may be truth out there that will challenge some of our long held beliefs or doctrines would be devastating. Forward thinking demands accountability and transparency—and the only way to fulfill this is through some heart provoking consideration of something different. Forward thinking affects our sincerity at its core. Forward thinking asks the tough questions and is open to the possibility that one may not have all the answers. Forward thinking treats people with respect and care. Jesus left his disciples with an array of questions—and I believe it was intentional. The most dangerous moment in the life of man is the point in which a man thinks he/she has arrived. Forward thinking says that I may not have all the answers but I sure am searching, praying, meditating, asking questions and actively trying to understand why a God so amazing could love someone so frail as myself. Going back to the hymns, one song that comes to mind is Where He Leads I’ll Follow! For most, the following has been replaced by stagnation due to their inability to part with their commonplace religious shoes. They have arrived, what more is there to pursue? Forward thinking demands total obedience powered by a heavy dose of humility unlike anything anyone has ever seen. Are you in favor of Forward thinking? It’s time to part with our commonplace shoes, as Steve likes to say! Blessings…

?

Question: Do you remember what I asked back in January about a new year’s resolution? Do you recall the one thing that I posed as a challenge for all of us? Popular writer and speaker Craig Groeschel titled his latest book, “Soul Detox”, speaks to heart of that resolution. Normally, folks are susceptible to maximizing resolutions. I simply posed one resolution, just one, for us to consider as we forge ahead in 2012. Now, how is that resolution working out for you? Moreover, do you remember the resolution? How is that resolution framing your spiritual walk to date? When Groeschel says detox, he means we need to declutter everything about us, so that we can begin to ‘get’ the message of the Cross, which is simply this: faithfulness. Back in January, I challenged all of us to do one thing differently this year, just be ‘faithful’ to God. That has been the point all year long. You’ll recall that I did not offer a litany of things, good things, to consider for 2012. I simply offered one. We are now a little more than halfway through 2012, and it is going by fast. Again, how is your year progressing? How is your commitment to Christ? How is your walk with God? Is the resolution to be faithful a burden or a blessing? Getting the point of life will mean so much more for all of us as we advance the cause of the Cross. What is the point again? The Cross of Christ! By being ‘faithful’ to Christ we are advocating a total and complete surrender to the power of the Cross, while also allowing it to declutter our lives. That is why the power of our 2012 challenge is so resounding. By being ‘faithful’ to God, we are honoring his Sovereignty. The Eminent Professor of New Testament, Dr. D. A. Carson put it succinctly when he said this:

“If God had perceived that our greatest need was economic, he would have sent an economist. If he had perceived that our greatest need was entertainment, he would have sent us a comedian or an artist. If God had perceived that our greatest need was political stability, he would have sent us a politician. If he had perceived that our greatest need was health, he would have sent us a doctor. But he perceived that our greatest need involved our sin, our alienation from him, our profound rebellion, our death; and he sent us a Savior.” [Spiritual Reformation, 109]

I fear that we sometimes convolute the issue, which is this—for detoxing to take effect, we have to declutter our lives. The best way to fulfill that aspect is by being faithful to God. By being faithful to God, we are saying that God is at the helm, and that God is the central reality. Dr. Carson makes a remarkable observation by highlighting what our awesome God is capable of. God decided to provide just what we need based on what was lacking. Because of sin, we are therefore alienated from him. Because of that alienation, God sent a Savior who in turn died to provide life and victory over death. Man’s greatest need is something so simple, a word that contains only 8 letters, f-a-i-t-h-f-u-l. Yet it is also man’s greatest challenge. In order for us to ‘get’ the point of life, we have to do that one thing, be sold out for God, and be faithful to him. How is that working out for you?

The Assault of Secularism

“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you would know my Father as well.” (John 14:6-7)

Dr. Albert Mohler, Jr., who serves as President of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, wrote a wonderful piece concerning the assault of secularism on orthodox Christianity. Dr. Mohler cites a rather crass assault on the fundamental beliefs of Christian students at Vanderbilt University, in Nashville, TN. Vanderbilt University to southerners is what Harvard University is to northerners. A simple study of the history of schools such as Harvard, Yale, Vanderbilt and others, will unearth an amazing reality: Most of the Universities in America were founded by Christian organizations. Take Vanderbilt for instance; historically, it was ‘founded by Christian believers for the purpose of inculcating Christian beliefs in its student. Vanderbilt was founded in the 1870s by Methodists and later funded largely by New York’s Vanderbilt family.’ As Dr. Mohler and others have noted, in just over several decades, the administration at Vanderbilt have strayed far from the founding principles of the university in an effort to accommodate the ‘emerging secular consensus in American higher education.’ Moreover, Dr. Mohler cites the president of Notre Dame, James Tunstead Burtchaell, who declared that Vanderbilt provides a glaring reality concerning the ‘secularization of American higher education’ known as the ‘disengagement of colleges and universities from their Christian churches.’ In other words, in an effort to appease its secular base, Vanderbilt University simply eviscerated its heritage, which was very much Christian oriented and ‘transformed itself into a secular university, embarrassed by its Christian founding.’ So how is Vanderbilt fulfilling its goal to advance secularism so as to saturate its culture? The administration at Vanderbilt informed religious groups on campus that had been ‘recognized student organizations’ for years that they have to ‘comply with an absolute non-discrimination policy.’ Simply put, the student body (Christian groups included) ‘must now allow any Vanderbilt student to be a candidate for a leadership office, regardless of religious beliefs or sexual orientation.’ For instance, a Christian group would have to allow anyone, regardless of their beliefs in terms of sexual orientation/preference, to run for office. Imagine Richard Dawkins at the helm of a Christian group (I am exaggerating of course)? The goal however is secularization, which is the polar opposite of exclusive Christianity.

The question on the minds of many is simply this: Why the push to eviscerate the old way, or in this case, the intent of the founders? James Peter Kenney offered at least part of the problem when he declared, ‘[that] all these public changes are ultimately grounded in a failure of belief and of nerve, in which the members of these religious communities lost the will to express their theologies in the academy. In each case, academics—even if they were religious—came to believe that faith did not yield knowledge apposite to the disciplines or relevant to public life.’ Another reason is what constitutional lawyer David French describes rather bluntly as ‘Vanderbilt’s mendacity, hypocrisy, and anti-Christian discrimination.’ French, who writes for the National Review went on to highlight a startling example of hypocrisy which countered the comments made by the ‘provost of the university [who] defended the policy, stating that student organizations may elect their own leaders, but may not disqualify any candidate based on, among other things, religious beliefs or sexual orientation’ (Mohler). French states: ‘The reality, of course, is that Vanderbilt is trying to force the orthodox Christian viewpoint off campus. The ‘nondiscrimination’ rhetoric is mere subterfuge. How can we know this? Because even as it works mightily to make sure that atheists can run Christian organizations, it is working just as mightily to protect the place and prerogatives of Vanderbilt’s powerful fraternities and sororities —organizations that explicitly discriminate, have never been open to ‘all comers,’ and cause more real heartache each semester for rejected students than any religious organization has ever inflicted in its entire history on campus. Vanderbilt’s embattled religious organizations welcome all students with open arms; Vanderbilt’s fraternities and sororities routinely reject their fellow students based on little more than appearance, family heritage, or personality quirks.” (Vanderbilt University Insults our Intelligence, March 30, 2012). French does highlight several dodgy areas that definitely require some consideration. I agree with his charge that the ‘nondiscrimination’ rhetoric as deceitful. It is intolerance at its best. (July 29, sermon “Intolerance or Tolerance” wherein I will unpack more of this thought process in light of Scriptures exclusive claims). However, the most damning articulation by French in relation to this mendacity is simple: Vanderbilt is merely pandering to its secularist supporters who find Christianity’s exclusive claims as problematic, and quite frankly, narrow minded and bigoted. Consequently, efforts to remove any semblance of orthodox Christian teaching and understanding off campus are well under way.

Why is this important? Think about the church, and how secularism has infiltrated its ranks and how it has subverted the authentic Christian message of Christ. Indeed, it was Christ who declared that he was the only way to God. Many today believe in a Jesus who loves all and requires nothing from anyone. Hence, we now have ‘believers’ who have created ‘buddy Jesus’ who agrees with anything they want. There are caricatures of ‘Inclusive Jesus’ who wants me to be on the inside, including non-believers, which in fact, is a markedly different portrayal of the Jesus we read of in the Bible. There are depictions of ‘Happy Jesus’ who wants all to be happy at all cost to themselves and to others. We now have ‘tax’ Jesus and ‘golden rule’ Jesus, and so on and so forth. There are so many variations of Jesus that one is forced to ask the question: Will the real Jesus please stand up? I mentioned caricature earlier. The danger of secularism within a Christian worldview is that it promotes a distortion of the real thing. Much like Vanderbilt, secularism aims to distort and dismantle worldview’s that are exclusive—in an effort to promote inclusiveness. But here is the caviar, it is not just any worldview, Vanderbilt is targeting only a particular worldview—namely, Christianity. The same goes for church as well. Secularism is an easier form of belief, because you simply don’t have to believe anything, no accountability, no responsibility; we simply live and let live. This ideology has a lot of perks mind you, the most attractive of course is the notion that you are basically in control.

But let us be reminded of the words of Solomon, who at the end of his illustrious life, famously said, “…all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man.” (Eccl. 12:13). Orthodox Christianity teaches that God is both exclusive and inclusive, but not according to our mortal definitions of the terms. Salvation is for all, [inclusive] but this salvation, comes only from the Son of God, (John 14:6) [exclusive]. Secularism excoriates the fear of God. Orthodox Christianity embraces it. As secularism continues its assault, the words of Eleanor Roosevelt come to mind, “Nobody can make you feel inferior without your consent.” Think of David, “I have hidden your word in my heart that I might not sin against you.” (Psa. 119:11). Now, Roosevelt is right in saying that ultimately, no one or no outside force of nature can take away that which you have hidden in your heart, without your consent. My prayer is that we will embrace the challenge, and meet it head on—and fight for the preciousness of God’s truth claims. After all, this is the whole duty of man. Blessings

A Product of the Environment indeed!

Several weeks ago, I had an interesting encounter with someone who attributed much of our current struggles to the government. Judging from comments on facebook, blogs, twitter and the mainstream media, I sense that the majority of people are frustrated with the government. Not everyone, of course, but most. Much of what I have read and observed, clearly portray a people wanting improvements in their government. Granted, the old adage, “To each its own meaning”—has to be taken into account when discussing matters that pertain to politics. Collectively there is frustration. But each individual has something that they would like see change or improve in terms of how the government should function and respond to the people. I do not wish for this to be a political medium but would like to offer a thought uttered by a former president. James A. Garfield shared these words:

“Now more than ever before, the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness and corruption. If it be intelligent, brave and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature....If the next centennial does not find us a great nation ... it will be because those who represent the enterprise, the culture, and the morality of the nation do not aid in controlling the political forces” [Garfield, The Works of James Abram Garfield, Vol.2, 486, 489].

His words are prophetic and revealing. I shared with my frustrated friend that politicians are a product of their environment. You and I are as well. It is inescapable and undeniable. President Garfield’s assertions are spot on. For the populace to expect their elected officials to somehow uphold their campaign promises once elected would be like wishing for the sun to somehow cease from rising in the morning. It is impossible. Why? Our elected officials will continue to behave the way they do unless society as a whole changes drastically in favor of godliness. Someone once said, you can take the boy out of the country, but you cannot take the country out of the boy. If the populace is not in favor of the principles and standards that one finds in God’s Word, such a people will be reckless, corrupt and will tolerate ignorance. What can be done then? For a society to experience high quality representatives, God has to penetrate the hearts of every man, woman and child. Now, think about the role of the church. Think about your role as a Christian. How can you make a difference?

“The Pilgrim”

John Bunyan (1628-1688) lived in England in a time of religious turmoil and civil war. Ignoring the magistrates order to stop preaching, he was imprisoned over a period of twelve years. John Bunyan was a man who had very little education. Yet, he has touched millions of lives over the centuries and inspired millions with his writings. Sometime around 1653, Bunyan became involved with preaching and several years later, he was arrested—not because of the content of his message, (though one could make a strong case) of things, preaching without a license. I guess if the Apostles were around in the 1600’s, they would’ve been arrested as well. Consequently, Bunyan spent twelve years in prison for the crime. An edict was issued in 1672 that saw Bunyan released from prison. But then in 1673, the “Declaration of Indulgence” was revoked and Bunyan was once again imprisoned. During the second imprisonment, Bunyan penned his masterpiece, “The Pilgrim’s Progress”—which was published years later. to understand the power of Bunyan’s masterpiece, it has been said “The Pilgrim’s Progress” is second only to the Bible in terms of publication. Bunyan passed away in 1688, but his work lives on. In prison he wrote these stirring words of courage.

Who would true valor see,
Let him come hither;
One here will constant be,
Come wind, come weather;
There’s no discouragement
Shall make him once relent
His first avowed intent
To be a Pilgrim.

Whoso beset him round
With dismal stories
Do but themselves confound;
His strength the more is.
No lion can him fright,
He’ll with a giant fight,
But he will have a right
To be a Pilgrim.

Hobgoblin nor foul fiend
Can daunt his spirit;
He knows he at the end
Shall life inherit.
Then fancies fly away,
He’ll fear not what men say;
He’ll labor night and day
To be a Pilgrim.

(Christian Values: Briscoe, 20; The Pilgrim’s Progress, 7)

“Change?”

It seems like the word ‘change’ has become the defining word for most people today. In almost every conversation—change inevitably dominates the discussion. Indeed, one would be hard pressed to deny that ‘change’ is in the air. A simple Google search will unearth this startling reality: America, as well as the World, are engaged in a massive shift that will define not only our generation but future generations as well. In fact, President Barack Obama ran on ‘change’—leaving quite an impression on many during his campaign. The fact that President Obama invoked change and was embraced by the people is impressive. It is especially impressive when you consider that ‘change’ doesn’t necessarily excite people. People are uncomfortable with change. Of course I am aware that some changes are healthy, but for the most part people are uncomfortable with it. In America today, change is evident, and it is widespread. For example, from an economic viewpoint, gas prices dominate—fluctuating at speeds that deserve a citation. From a societal perspective, one will find that crassness is fast defining the folks’ point of reference. Morality continues to bleed uncontrollably, paving the way for immorality, the dominating force of our day. From a political vantage point, the upheaval is not that difficult to decipher. The Blue does not like the Red and unfortunately the bickering and fighting is endless. Much is on hold until the sides can agree on something. Meanwhile, religious change is deafening. It is becoming more and more unacceptable for anyone to advocate Christian principles, especially in public, because many find it repugnant and offensive. Christianity as a dominating point of reference (a point of reference by the way, which dominated the Founding Fathers’ thought process) is making way to a more ‘proper’ way: Religious equality. This simply means that Christians should embrace other religions like, Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism, etc., instead of thinking of themselves as ‘exclusive.’ Now, from a technological perspective, the benefits are enormous. The improvements in communication are exciting, while computers continue to amaze with the ability to process information. Change, is inevitable. Change is sometimes warranted, whether we like it or not. Change is a part of life. There are changes currently taking form and shape in your lives as I write this. Some of you in the last few years have had to endure some difficult times in your lives. Some have had to make some significant adjustments in the last year or so; some good, while others were hard to accept. Some of you have had to endure the loss of a loved one, while others lost jobs and have had to search for new ones. Through all of these changes, I am sure we have all questioned God’s loyalty and awareness of our situations. I don’t know why certain things happen the way they do. I wish I did. But I know this one thing: God is faithful and God is good. Whatever changes you are entrenched in currently, know this: God is with you, all the way through to the end. I leave you with these powerful words, “The Lord himself goes before you and will be with you; he will never leave you nor forsake you. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged.” [Deut. 31: 8].

“Excellent—restored!”

Moses provided one of the most audacious statements in the Bible: “Then God looked over all that he had made, and it was excellent in every way” (Gen 1:31 LB). I used audacious simply because of the magnitude and breadth of Moses’ claim—that God, Almighty God, created something remarkable. Often times, in conversation, I am captivated by people who try to imagine what heaven will be like; for instance whether or not they will see their loved ones or what questions they wish to ask God. I don’t know what the questions will be, but I know this much, I don’t have any comprehension of what the experience of heaven will be like. I do know that we will be in God’s presence with no more tears, no more death, no more crying, no more pain, and the surroundings will be brand spankin’ new (cf. Rev 21:3ff). While I thank John and others for their attempts to describe heaven, I am somehow certain that we are only given a speck of the real deal. On the same note, please do not ask me to explain what earth, prior to the fall, must’ve been like. I could try to imagine what Moses meant by excellent, but unfortunately, my imagination would fail me because words cannot describe what God calls excellent. I will only limit what it was like if I attempt an explanation. My job, however, is to marvel. And that too—is a very complex thing, trying to marvel at God’s creation—which was succinctly called, excellent. This seemingly obvious conflict is because we live in a broken world. We were born into a world humbled and wearied by suffering, brokenness, pain, sorrow, trouble, heartache, and burdened by death. Creation, as we know it, simply does not represent what God called excellent thousands of years ago. This is not the same reality that God was pleased with before the creation of man (Gen 1:25). Unfortunately, we live in a world marred and saturated in sin. What about restoration? That is what Christ did for you and me, as Paul asserted in his letter to the Corinthians, “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!” (2 Cor. 5:17). This new reality is simply amazing. God’s purpose never changed. Though the world as we know it today may not be the excellent one that God fashioned thousands of years ago, God has restored excellence through you and me, ardent supporters of Almighty God through Jesus Christ. Though we live in a broken world, the reality is that the Son of God brought restoration for all who choose the Cross as the central landmark in their lives. Consequently, the excellent is no longer defined by external realities, but rather, by the Cross of Christ. I pray that you will recognize the intentional restoration taking place within each of us daily. Indeed, David was right when he said, “Lord our Lord, your name is the most [excellent] name in all the earth” (Ps 8:9 NCV). Rejoice therefore, for we wear the name, this most excellent name, because of restoration guaranteed by the Cross!

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Happy Birthday C.S.Lewis

"Every Christian would agree that a man’s spiritual health is exactly proportional to his love for God" ~ C. S. Lewis

"We live, in fact, in a world starved for solitude, silence, and privacy: and therefore starved for meditation and true friendship" ~ C. S. Lewis

"Those that hate goodness are sometimes nearer than those that know nothing at all about it and think they have it already" ~ C. S. Lewis

"To love at all is to be vulnerable. Love anything and your heart will be wrung and possibly broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact you must give it to no one, not even an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements. Lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket, safe, dark, motionless, airless, it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable. To love is to be vulnerable." C. S. Lewis

Making it count...

Several centuries ago, the apostle Paul made this powerful remark: "Be very careful, then, how you live--not as unwise but as wise, making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil" (Eph. 5:15-16). And when you add Peter's rejoinder, "But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect..." (1 Pet. 3:15)--one can clearly get a sense of what is required of us.

But what is the meaning of these statements? Clearly, the intent and content of these powerful assertions cannot be overlooked. These verses represent a unifying call, by those who walked with Jesus, of the usefulness of His message. The message of the Cross! In a time when the Cross continues to come under massive assault, what is even more startling and scarier is the silence emanating from Christians, followers of Jesus, who are themselves struggling with their identity in Christ. This silence of course is a failure to provide a counter response to the secularization that has now come to define society. The Bible, over and over again, reminds us, and demands us, to stand up for Christ. To defend Him! After all, didn't Paul remark that we take advantage of every opportunity? So then, what are doing about it?

Dan Plyler, articulated a reason for our hesitancy and pointed to our "being unlearned and uninformed." One way to defend the faith, hope that we have in Christ, is by indulging in His Word in order for us to understand His provisions for us. And given the fact that we are living in an era where people want for their to be meaning without subscribing to God, the call to take advantage has never been greater and louder.

However, there is caution, in that we can do all of these and more--but the one thing that we have to remember is: "[r]egardless of how well we present and defend the truth of God (as Scripture clearly calls us to do) none of our efforts are what ultimately changes the heart. That task is for God's Spirit alone as he is the only one capable" (Plyler). Meanwhile, let us to what we've commissioned to do--the rest is up to God.

Talofa

Life

"My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be a part of the show, find myself in such a violent reaction against it? A man feels wet when he falls in the water, because man is not a water animal: a fish would not feel wet. Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. But if I did that, then my argument against God collapsed too-for the argument depended on saying that the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my fancies. Thus in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist-in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless-I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality-namely my idea of justice-was full of sense. Consequently atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just has, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be a word without meaning." (C S Lewis, Mere Christianity, 45-46)

Meaning?

The famed Danish philosopher and author Soren Kierkegaard uttered these famous thoughts in his work Fear and Trembling: "If there were no eternal consciousness in a man, if at the bottom of everything there were only a wild ferment, a power that twisting in dark passions produced everything great or inconsequential; if an unfathomable, insatiable emptiness lay hid beneath everything, what would life be but despair?

Consider the ramifications of these words, in a culture that is becoming increasingly void of meaning and purpose, in favor of relativism. Kierkegaard, I think, posits a very radical view or purpose and meaning, and in his book, these components are the result of one thing, faith. To arrive at an understanding of meaning and purpose, one would have, according to Kierkegaard, resign from reason, in order to capture the essence of faith. Now, Kierkegaard's view of course, is in stark contrast to that of another equally famous physicist, Stephen Hawkings, who boldly stated in an interview that, "[he] regards[s] the [human] brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark" (theguardian.co.uk, 2011).

These two competing views however, resurrect an interesting question: Is life meaningful? One would be hard pressed to find meaning in Hawking's assessment that life is basically all there is, and the idea of an afterlife is simply a 'fairy tale' and we are but mere computers doomed for destruction at some point. Kierkegaard would agree that if we are but mere computers passing through the world as a ' thoughtless and fruitless whim'--then life would be 'empty and devoid' of meaning and purpose. Incidentally, these two compelling views are some of the most discussed views among Christians and non-Christians. For non-Christians, life ends here on earth. For Christians, life here on earth is but a stepping stone; a journey designed to provide a glimpse of what the afterlife has to offer. Indeed, we long or heaven, our home, that our Christ has prepared for us royals (1 Pet. 2.9), mansions (John 14.2) galore. God provides hope...

Freedom?

One of the most profound statements by Paul is the one he shares with the folks in Galatians: "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with teh yoke of bondage"--Gal 5:1. The liberty entailed in this verse is one amazing word, because it postulates this notion of freedom that can only be found in and through God, validated by His Son, Jesus Christ. There are several factors that pertain to freedom, indeed, there is the sense of freedom that is realized by considering the Cross more potent and amazing and revelatory in nature, over the law. Paul stressed this aspect emphatically in his letter to the Corinthians (2 Cor 3.1ff). He even went so far to emphazise that his main concern for the most part is being right with the Cross (1 Cor 2.2). Paul, in order to dispense the potency of the Cross over the law, shared that freedom is realized through the Cross. Second, Paul again shared that the cost of serving Christ is freedom, but now, in a different sense. It was articulated in the Roman epistle that "When [people] were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness" (Rom 6.20) essentially highlighting the cost of serving Christ is freedom--only in this sense, it is freedom from self and its pleasures. Finally, Paul espouses yet another aspect of freedom for Christians: freedom to serve Christ without fear of anything--: which the apostle reveals profoundly in several of his epistles (see. esp. Romans 14; 1 Cor 8). Consider this from Paul, "Be careful, however, that the exercise of your freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak" (1 Cor 8.9)--reveals how Christians have been affecting and imposing their will and philosophies on others (see. Col 2.6-10). I love the fact that despite all of our differences, economically, interllectually, etc., we coalesce as one people freed by Christ--so we can be free of desires, and in turn, serve Him freely. How amazing indeed.

How 'bout 'em relationships

The Barna Research Group revealed in a recent research titled, "Teen Roles Model: Who They Are, Why The Matter, (January 2011), unearthed a reality that shouldn't surprise us. The initial question probed the teens to identify the person with whom they admire the most, other than their parents. The first question postulated was 'who' which was followed by another equally probing question, 'why.' Regarding the 'who'--the majority cited relations such as grandparents, sister, brother, cousins, aunts, and uncles (37%), followed by teachers and coaches (11%), friends (9%), and pastors/religious leaders (6%). The 'why' indicated the reasons for the answers, or why they named a particular role-model. According to the study, 26% stated that the most common rationale highlighted by the teens included traits such as caring about others, loving, polite, and being fun. Additionally, the 'why' also found that 11% cited encouragement as a vital contributing factor, along with helping them to accomplish their goals (13%), overcome adversity (9%), hard worker (7%), maintain strong faith (6%). (http://www.barna.org/) The interesting revelation from this study is simply a recognition of a known fact: Despite our varied backgrounds, or differences in how we interpret, translate, approach different things in life, the one thing that we can agree on is that at the heart of man, is a yearning for relationships. The study did show that the majority of teens pointed to people they most admire and were likely to emulate, are those whom they were able to maintain contact with, or personal connection. This revelation emphatically sustains the point that are relational beings despite what we may think. And if we cannot perpetuate a desire for relationships, we simply cannot expect to be in the midst of relationship minded folks. And when that materializes, how do we expect to connect with anyone? List to Paul, "Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. Therefore, we are have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers (Galatians 6:7-10) So then, if we sow a sincere and deep desire for relationships, despite everything to the contrary, we reap closer connections, as the study revealed. So, let's perpetuate relationship building, because it may the last thread holding man together from disintegrating in this chaotic world of 'me, me, me' pursuits. Let's sow that which pleases the Lord, it makes for a super fun harvest.

Gas Effect

I'm sure you've noticed the steady rise in gas prices of late. And you are probably aware of the many reasons 'why' prices fall and rise, although the latter seems to be the standard of late. At any rate, I came across an article this week that seems to explain some of the intricate details of what determines the prices of gasoline/oil and I thought I'd share with you.

"Gas prices rise when oil prices rise, and fall when oil prices fall--except when they don't. What you pay at your gas station depends on an array of factors, from what happens on an exchange in New York to what the competition is charging...Unlike an iPhone or a pair of jeans or a Big Mac, oil and gas are commodities, and their prices can change every second at the New York Mercantile Exchange and other trading hubs, Those far-off changes affect the cost of the next day's commute...Sellers of commodities, like gas station owners and refineries, price their product based not on what it costs to produce it, but on what it costs to replace it...Oil prices can be moved by geopolitics, the value of the dollar, extreme weather or Chinese [and Indian] demands[s]. Gas prices can be moved by oil prices, refinery problems or even weather that might keep drivers at home." (By Jonathan Fahey, AP Energy Writer)

Additionally, federal and state taxes also contribute to the cost of the gasoline that is purchase at pump. However, there is another factor to add to long list itemised by Fahey in his account (he may have implied it somewhere, but nevertheless, it was not revealed explicitly) and that is fear. The reason prices rise and fall is because of fear powered by uncertainty. And whenever you exchange/sell/trade a commodity like oil, there is much uncertainty involved. The bottom line is this; fear of the unknown invariably drives the prices up or down. May I propose to you something that you and I can be certain of in a world driven almost exclusively by fear, and that is LOVE.

According to John, "There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love" (1 John 4:18). How profound. How marvelous. How amazing. We unfortunately have little to no control over the uncertainties with oil/gas prices and the fluctuations therein. We can't control the fear that cripples traders' trading at New York's Mercantile Exchange. But we do control one thing, and this one thing is so much more than oil or any other commodity or product. This one, when it is not handled shared and exchanged with care, it could spell the end of mankind. What is it? It is love. Praise God. Love is the real 'effect.'

Funny Times

Earlier this week, I noticed that gasoline prices in our area were stable at 2.94 a gal. A day later, it had gone up to 3.09 a gal. And then today, Thurs. Feb. 24th, it had spiked to 3.22 a gal. Yikes! The forecasters are saying that it could go as high as 4.00 a gal. What's the point? Well, let's just say that the recent explanation given for the current surge is: 'Uncertainty' in Lybia. My only question is, wasn't the spike already in place before the Moammar Gadhafi fiasco escalated out of whack? Funny!

I saw on TV where a soccer player, desperate to give his team a free kick close to their goal line, deliberately used an opponent's arm to hit him in the face. I guess, desperate times = desperate measures. It was really hilarious, especially in slow motion. The only problem was, despite his efforts, the trickster's team lost anyway. Funny!

And what about the prank call that WI governor Scott Walker got from pretender Ian Murphy? Here, the governor thought he was talking to billionaire David Koch, a conservative, but instead, he was talking to a liberal organizer from Buffalo. I find it hard to believe that with all the power at the governor's disposal, along with the people who work for the governor to ensure that he gets the right information and the right people to talk to, something embarrassing like this could happen. Funny!

Funny times indeed!

"The Good OId Days"

I came across this article while visiting some friends at a nursing home, and I thought, wow--this is a pretty cool article.

"The other day, someone at a store in our town read that a methamphetamine lab had been found in an old farm house in the adjoining county and he asked me a rhetorical question: "Why didn't we have a drug problem when you and I were growing up?" I replied: "But I did have a drug problem when I was a kid growing up on the farm."

I had a drug problem when I was a young: I was drug to church Sunday morning. I was drug to church for weddings and funerals. I was drug to family reunions and community socials no matter the weather.

I was drug by my ears when I was disrespectful to adults. I was also drug to the woodshed when I disobeyed my parents, told a lie, brought home a bad report card, did not speak with respect, spoke ill to the teacher or the preacher. Or if I didn't put forth my best effort in everything that was asked of me. I was drug to the kitchen sink to have my mouth washed out with soap if I uttered a profane four letter word. I was drug out to pull weeds in mom's garden and flower beds and cockleburs out of dad's fields.

I was drug to the homes of family, friends, and neighbors to help out some poor soul who had no one to mow the yard, repair the clothesline or chop some fire wood. And if my mother had ever known that I took a single dime as a tip for this kindness, she would have drug me out to the wood shed.

Those drugs are still in my veins; and they affect my behavior in everything I do, say or think. They are stronger than cocaine, crack or heroin, and if today's children had this kind of drug problem, America might be a better place today." (Author Unknown)

I like the part about 'speaking ill to the preacher' personally :). But in all seriousness, this kind of mindset was fashioned in an environment where respect, honesty and integrity were impressed amongst people. I would add though, that if God were at the forefront of what we do through the church, America will be an even better place today.

"Why So Serious?"

Does the name Steve Johnson ring a bell? Chances are, you've never heard of the guy. well, Steve happens to be the leading receiver for the resurgent Buffalo Bills football team. I say resurgent because Sunday, November 28th, the Bills played the Steelers and had they won that game, it would have been their 3rd win in a row, which is something they have not been able to accomplish in years. Prior to Sunday's game, Johnson not only recorded 137 receiving yards, but he celebrated one of his three TD's by lifting his jersey to show a famous quote by the late Heath Ledger: "Why So Serious?" So, back to the game against the Steelers, Johnson during overtime had the coverage beaten, and all he had to do was catch a perfectly thrown pass from his quarterback, a Harvard guy! Perfect pass, perfect route by the receiver, in the NFL usually translate into points. But that wasn't the case that Sunday. Johnson infamously 'dropped' the pass in the end zone. Following the game, the same Johnson who was a proponent of not taking oneself seriously, tweeted: I PRAISE YOU 24/7!!!!!AND THIS IS HOW YOU DO ME!!!!!YOU EXPECT ME TO LEARN FRO THIS???HOW???ILL NEVER FORGET THIS!!EVER!!THX THO...,"

The drop dominated headlines throughout the NFL, because even a high school player could have held on to the pass. But his post-game tweet captured my attention. I believe it was an honest remark by a disheartened person, someone who had just witnessed his world caving in from all directions. I admire his bluntness, however ill-directed. Admittedly, I wonder how many of us blame the misfortunes of life on God--while also failing to credit him for our success. Listen to the words of Paul:

"I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want. I can do all things through him who gives my strength" (Philippians 4:12-13).

Paul knew what it felt like to have things, and what if felt like not having anything. He was aware that in his ministry, hardships and challenges were as much a part of like as blessings. It is hard to be joyful when things aren't going well. Johnson was pretty loose (why so serious) until he dropped what should have been the game winning TD. And we too, are pretty tolerant and understanding until challenges and difficulties materialize. But like Paul, let us strive to be 'content in any and every situation', however dire it may be. Have a Jesus Day